Dear Emmanuel,
Voici le fichier demandé
Regards,
Didier
Search found 943 matches
- Thu 10 Oct 2024 12:21
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: No GUI with Fedora 40
- Replies: 3
- Views: 24
- Tue 8 Oct 2024 16:56
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: No GUI with Fedora 40
- Replies: 3
- Views: 24
Re: No GUI with Fedora 40
Hi Emmanuel,
As usual, what doesn't work for you works for me, making it difficult to correct what does work.
Regards,
Didier
As usual, what doesn't work for you works for me, making it difficult to correct what does work.
Regards,
Didier
- Tue 8 Oct 2024 15:04
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: What does the Z in density represent?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 17
Re: What does the Z in density represent?
Dear Li,
This is the length (mm) of the bunch.
Regards,
Didier
This is the length (mm) of the bunch.
Regards,
Didier
- Tue 8 Oct 2024 15:01
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: System error: Segmentation violation
- Replies: 2
- Views: 22
Re: System error: Segmentation violation
Dear shliu,
It's fixed.
Regards,
Didier
It's fixed.
Regards,
Didier
- Mon 7 Oct 2024 11:11
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Phase offset between field maps [SOLVED]
- Replies: 21
- Views: 11910
Re: Phase offset between field maps [SOLVED]
Dear Wai-Ming, I agree with everything you wrote, except "the RF phase" does NOT depend on the length of the fieldmap. Whichever option you choose for parameter#10, if you set a synchronous phase value, the RF phase will necessarily depend on the field in the cavity, i.e. minimally on its length. In...
- Fri 4 Oct 2024 15:29
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Second beam mass [SOLVED]
- Replies: 3
- Views: 90
Re: Second beam mass [SOLVED]
Dear Pedro,
Indeed, I see the problem.
It's been corrected in the latest version available on the site
Regards,
Didier
Indeed, I see the problem.
It's been corrected in the latest version available on the site
Regards,
Didier
- Fri 4 Oct 2024 13:38
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Second beam mass [SOLVED]
- Replies: 3
- Views: 90
Re: Second beam mass [SOLVED]
Dear Pedro,
Please show me your example, because on my side everthing seems ok (see below)
Regards,
Didier
Please show me your example, because on my side everthing seems ok (see below)
Regards,
Didier
- Fri 4 Oct 2024 09:52
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Phase offset between field maps [SOLVED]
- Replies: 21
- Views: 11910
Re: Phase offset between field maps [SOLVED]
Dear Wai-Ming,
Could you be more specific, as I've compared the latest version with the one from 6 months ago and I can't see any difference, except for the name of the RF phase.
Regards,
Didier
Could you be more specific, as I've compared the latest version with the one from 6 months ago and I can't see any difference, except for the name of the RF phase.
Regards,
Didier
- Wed 25 Sep 2024 17:59
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Drop in longitudinal emittance in RFQ
- Replies: 2
- Views: 92
Re: Drop in longitudinal emittance in RFQ
Dear Jeroen, As can be seen from your simulation below, a certain number of particles are detached in energy, making the longitudinal emittance larger and larger, until one of them is lost on the wall of the RFQ, abruptly resetting the emittance to a lower value. To overcome this problem in calculat...
- Wed 11 Sep 2024 16:07
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Energy beam of input beam [SOLVED]
- Replies: 1
- Views: 114
Re: Energy beam of input beam [SOLVED]
Dear Pedro,
This is obviously not the behaviour that is expected, of course the distribution is not lost and it is only the average energy that is affected. Could you send me your example, because what you're indicating isn't normal and I don't observe that.
Regards,
Didier
This is obviously not the behaviour that is expected, of course the distribution is not lost and it is only the average energy that is affected. Could you send me your example, because what you're indicating isn't normal and I don't observe that.
Regards,
Didier