Search found 101 matches
- Thu 1 Feb 2024 21:08
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Lattice command
- Replies: 1
- Views: 207
Lattice command
Dear Didier, Currently, the lattice command requires the same number of elements for all successive focusing periods. Quite often it is practically difficult to fulfill this requirement. Would you kindly consider adding a version of the lattice command that counts only the quad elements. It would be...
- Wed 19 Jul 2023 04:46
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Diag_Particles
- Replies: 6
- Views: 13215
Re: Diag_Particles
Dear Didier,
Is the following a valid combination? Does it target at 0.5mA at the location of the diagnostics?
Input beam current = 1mA
diag_current 99 50 0 1
best regards,
Wai-Ming
Is the following a valid combination? Does it target at 0.5mA at the location of the diagnostics?
Input beam current = 1mA
diag_current 99 50 0 1
best regards,
Wai-Ming
- Tue 18 Jul 2023 04:21
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Diag_Particles
- Replies: 6
- Views: 13215
Re: Diag_Particles
Dear Didier,
So in the case of zero current, what does the "Ib" means in the statement "DIAG_CURRENT N Ib"? Is it the number of particles?
Also, does the same apply to DIAG_DCURRENT?
Best regards,
Wai-Ming
So in the case of zero current, what does the "Ib" means in the statement "DIAG_CURRENT N Ib"? Is it the number of particles?
Also, does the same apply to DIAG_DCURRENT?
Best regards,
Wai-Ming
- Wed 10 May 2023 04:29
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: "save" button [SOLVED]
- Replies: 5
- Views: 14358
Re: "save" button [SOLVED]
Dear Didier,
Ah! I only realized that there are two save buttons after you mentioned it. I kept pressing the project save button and mistakenly hoped it would save the .dat file. Problem solved.
Best regards,
Wai-Ming
Ah! I only realized that there are two save buttons after you mentioned it. I kept pressing the project save button and mistakenly hoped it would save the .dat file. Problem solved.
Best regards,
Wai-Ming
- Tue 9 May 2023 15:48
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: set_sync_phase [SOLVED]
- Replies: 9
- Views: 17446
Re: set_sync_phase [SOLVED]
Dear Didier, and other colleagues, Can you command on the difficulty with set_sync_phase when the voltage is too high relative to the input beam energy? Is it a pure mathematical and optimization difficulty? Or is it physical so that one should avoid when it happens in the model? Best regards, Wai-M...
- Tue 9 May 2023 15:27
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: "save" button [SOLVED]
- Replies: 5
- Views: 14358
Re: "save" button [SOLVED]
Dear Didier,
I am running Version 2.21.0.12 on Windows 10.
Best regards,
Wai-Ming
I am running Version 2.21.0.12 on Windows 10.
Best regards,
Wai-Ming
- Fri 5 May 2023 16:42
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: "save" button [SOLVED]
- Replies: 5
- Views: 14358
"save" button [SOLVED]
Dear Didier,
The "save" icon doesn't seem to be effective. The .ini project file and the .dat layout file do not save until I close the GUI and choose "yes" to save.
Best regards,
Wai-Ming
The "save" icon doesn't seem to be effective. The .ini project file and the .dat layout file do not save until I close the GUI and choose "yes" to save.
Best regards,
Wai-Ming
- Tue 2 May 2023 22:14
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Match using Diagnostics with Partran
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6074
Re: Match using Diagnostics with Partran
Please use the example project in this attachment.
The example project from the previous message was wrong.
The example project from the previous message was wrong.
- Tue 2 May 2023 22:09
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Match using Diagnostics with Partran
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6074
Re: Match using Diagnostics with Partran
Dear Didier,
I do not understand your suggestion. Can you illustrate it in the attached example? Please show if I can optimize diag_size with envelope only, and optimize diag_energy with Partran.
Best regards,
Wai-Ming
I do not understand your suggestion. Can you illustrate it in the attached example? Please show if I can optimize diag_size with envelope only, and optimize diag_energy with Partran.
Best regards,
Wai-Ming
- Sat 29 Apr 2023 04:51
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Match using Diagnostics with Partran
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6074
Match using Diagnostics with Partran
Dear Didier, I would like to request the functionality to Match using Diagnostics With Partran ONLY for part of the diagnostics in the beam line. I run into cases where for some diagnostics (e.g. phase space) is meaningless without Partran, while other diagnostics (e.g. beam trajectories) is reasona...