Dear Didier,
Thanks for your help.
Bruce
Search found 89 matches
- Wed 16 Jul 2025 02:21
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Log scale in density plots does not work
- Replies: 4
- Views: 59
- Tue 15 Jul 2025 05:01
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Log scale in density plots does not work
- Replies: 4
- Views: 59
Re: Log scale in density plots does not work
Dear Didier,
Thanks for your question.
More than the full plot on a log scale, I would like the color map legend to be on a log scale. Previous version has in log scale.
As shown in the attached figure. Best regards,
Bruce
Thanks for your question.
More than the full plot on a log scale, I would like the color map legend to be on a log scale. Previous version has in log scale.
As shown in the attached figure. Best regards,
Bruce
- Fri 11 Jul 2025 04:29
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Log scale in density plots does not work
- Replies: 4
- Views: 59
Log scale in density plots does not work
Dear TraceWin developer,
The log scale in the density and power density does not work.
Please see the attached image.
Best regards,
Bruce
The log scale in the density and power density does not work.
Please see the attached image.
Best regards,
Bruce
- Thu 16 May 2024 02:01
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Chopper definition
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1972
Re: Chopper definition
Dear Didier,
Thank you very much for the confirmation.
Best regards,
Bruce
Thank you very much for the confirmation.
Best regards,
Bruce
- Wed 15 May 2024 07:47
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Chopper definition
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1972
Re: Chopper definition
Dear Didier, Thank you very much for your explanation. Please let me confirm the following: In your chopper definition, both plates are charged with the same voltage amplitude but opposite polarity, right? My chopper, one of the plates is grounded. So, to simulate in TraceWin, I must use half of the...
- Wed 8 May 2024 10:13
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Chopper definition
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1972
Chopper definition
Dear Didier, Thanks for your help and time, I am doing chopper simulation, and I would like to confirm some details about the definition in TraceWin. According to the manual, the chopper is defined as Chopper_TraceWin.png I compared it with other definitions in the literature: Chopper definition.png...
- Fri 1 Dec 2023 08:59
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Problems with error studies using 2.23.1.7 TraceWin version
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3005
Re: Problems with error studies using 2.23.1.7 TraceWin version
Dear Didier,
I am not so sure, if you got the lattice files (I sent you yesterday using the private message of this forum).
Thus, I sent you a simple lattice where the error occurs for version 2.23.1.7, but it seems not for older versions. Best regards,
Bruce
I am not so sure, if you got the lattice files (I sent you yesterday using the private message of this forum).
Thus, I sent you a simple lattice where the error occurs for version 2.23.1.7, but it seems not for older versions. Best regards,
Bruce
- Wed 29 Nov 2023 05:15
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Problems with error studies using 2.23.1.7 TraceWin version
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3005
Problems with error studies using 2.23.1.7 TraceWin version
Dear Didier, I am having some problems when I make error studies using the new version (2.23.1.7) of TraceWin. With the new version, I have a considerably large beam loss compared with the previous version of TraceWin. As an example, I compared the results using 2.23.1.7 and 2.23.0.5 versions. Trace...
- Wed 22 Feb 2023 06:30
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Problem with % option on the emittance plot
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3190
Re: Problem with % option on the emittance plot
Dear Didier,
Thank you very much,
Bruce
Thank you very much,
Bruce
- Mon 20 Feb 2023 01:23
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Problem with % option on the emittance plot
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3190
Re: Problem with % option on the emittance plot
Dear Didier, Thanks for your reply. In the version, I plot the emittance (Please see the next plot) Normal_emittance.png When, I select the % option (mark my red) Normal_emittance_2.png The plot does not show the % of the emittance growth. Maybe, I am doing something wrong. Best regards, Bruce