CEA Codes forum

Dear Didier, Thanks for your help and time, I am doing chopper simulation, and I would like to confirm some details about the definition in TraceWin. According to the manual, the chopper is defined as Chopper_TraceWin.png I compared it with other definitions in the literature: Chopper definition.png...

Dear Didier,

I am not so sure, if you got the lattice files (I sent you yesterday using the private message of this forum).

Thus, I sent you a simple lattice where the error occurs for version 2.23.1.7, but it seems not for older versions. Best regards,

Bruce

Dear Didier, I am having some problems when I make error studies using the new version (2.23.1.7) of TraceWin. With the new version, I have a considerably large beam loss compared with the previous version of TraceWin. As an example, I compared the results using 2.23.1.7 and 2.23.0.5 versions. Trace...

Dear Didier,

Thank you very much,

Bruce

Dear Didier, Thanks for your reply. In the version, I plot the emittance (Please see the next plot) Normal_emittance.png When, I select the % option (mark my red) Normal_emittance_2.png The plot does not show the % of the emittance growth. Maybe, I am doing something wrong. Best regards, Bruce

Dear Didier,

The option to plot the emittance in percentage does not work.
I am using version 2.20.0.3

Could you confirm that problem?

Best regards,

Bruce

Dear Didier,

Thank you very much for your help, Could you share the 2014 reference if you have?

best regards,

Bruce

Dear Didier, Thank you very much for the explanation. I was thinking that if G=0 and GFR=0, the high multipole coefficients are defined as Gn (i.e., Sextupole gradient (T/m^2) ). Because my understanding is that if GFR is not null, the input coefficients are Un (relative) If not (GFR =0), the input ...

Dear Didier, Thanks for your answer. I have a couple of questions: 1) By using a zero-length quadrupole, according to the manual: If L equals 0, the quadrupole is simulated as thin lens and all gradients have to be replaced by their integral (over longitudinal direction) values. So, the G, G3,G4, G5...

Dear Didier, About the implementation of multipole coefficient in bending magnets using "bend" and thin "quad" elements. I want to confirm if the following implementation is correct: 1) Bending magnet: EDGE 45 4500 100 0.45 2.8 100 1 BEND -90 4500 0 100 1 EDGE 45 4500 100 0.45 2.8 100 1 2) Divide th...