Search found 50 matches
- Thu 2 Sep 2021 13:28
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Field map implementation
- Replies: 31
- Views: 9441
Re: Field map implementation
Dear Didier, please find attached files with FIELD MAP implementation. My question: does the 4th parameter of FIELD_MAP (R - aperture) have influence on the calculated results? In the 1st archive, R was set to 9 in accordance with field files whereas it was set to 20 in the 2nd archive. As it is see...
- Thu 2 Sep 2021 10:44
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Emittance increase in dipoles
- Replies: 15
- Views: 4559
Re: Emittance increase in dipoles
Dear Didier, I have same question about emittance growth. In my case there are no any accelerating elements as well as radiation in the line (just Quads and two bends). Yes, I took into account beam charge volume density, but I cannot understand why did 6D emittance significantly (I mean that it is ...
- Mon 23 Aug 2021 17:10
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Field map implementation
- Replies: 31
- Views: 9441
Re: Field map implementation
Dear Didier, unfortunately ke =1 did not help. Error message is still the same. What else can it be?
- Sat 21 Aug 2021 21:52
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Field map implementation
- Replies: 31
- Views: 9441
Re: Field map implementation
Dear Didier, one more problem with 3D RF field introduction into project.
Please, check my project (see attachment ) and answer me what is wrong and why program return next messages: ?
Regards, Vyacheslav.
Please, check my project (see attachment ) and answer me what is wrong and why program return next messages: ?
Regards, Vyacheslav.
- Fri 9 Jul 2021 18:39
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: second beam output phase space
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1287
Re: second beam output phase space
Dear Didier,
when preparing project files to send you, I merged a number of consequent drift elements in one and rerun calculation. Obtained results below and looks more correct. Some strange effect took place. and Regards, Vyacheslav.
when preparing project files to send you, I merged a number of consequent drift elements in one and rerun calculation. Obtained results below and looks more correct. Some strange effect took place. and Regards, Vyacheslav.
- Thu 8 Jul 2021 22:58
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: second beam output phase space
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1287
second beam output phase space
Dear Didier, after transfer line (no acceleration, no radiation and so on) calculation for one kind of particles with charge state Z I run calcalation for the same particle with the same parameters, but slightly different by beta (at the level about 1.5*10^{-3}) and charge state Z-1. Output particle...
- Mon 28 Jun 2021 09:06
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Field map implementation
- Replies: 31
- Views: 9441
Re: Field map implementation
Dear Didier,
thus, to use previously obtained results, it still needed to run calculation in the envelope mode.
Is it right?
thus, to use previously obtained results, it still needed to run calculation in the envelope mode.
Is it right?
- Thu 10 Jun 2021 12:16
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Field map implementation
- Replies: 31
- Views: 9441
Re: Field map implementation
Dear Didier, why does Linac Energy differ from Beam one? energy.jpg What does Linac Energy mean? Is it energy of the synchronous particle? Is the beam energy is the mean value on the all particle energies? How can I change synchronous particle phase? Just using SET_SYNC_PHASE before FIELD_MAP and pu...
- Wed 9 Jun 2021 18:11
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Field map implementation
- Replies: 31
- Views: 9441
Re: Field map implementation
kz=2*pi/beta*lambda - longitudinal propagation factor (wave number)
- Wed 9 Jun 2021 17:24
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Field map implementation
- Replies: 31
- Views: 9441
Re: Field map implementation
Am I right that Ez(x,y,z,t)=Ez(x,y,z)*cos(omega*t-kz*z), where Ez is the field map data value is a correct expression for the right-side of z-motion equation?