Thank you, Nicholas.
Wai-Ming
Search found 104 matches
- Mon 6 Mar 2023 20:31
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Space charge compensation for field map [SOLVED]
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4283
- Sat 4 Mar 2023 20:29
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Space charge compensation for field map [SOLVED]
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4283
Re: Space charge compensation for field map [SOLVED]
Dear Nicholas, I have seen you used the term "space charge compensation field map" or "field map containing the space charge compensation according to z". I do not understand what that is. Using a 1D electric field map as an example (edz), it is a list of numbers for the electric field strength with...
- Fri 3 Mar 2023 19:21
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Space charge compensation for field map [SOLVED]
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4283
Re: Space charge compensation for field map [SOLVED]
Dear Nicolas,
Thank you for your answer. Do you mean that Ki is a scaling factor for the strength of the field map?
My understanding to SPACE_CHARGE_COMP is scaling factor for the beam current in space charge calculation during transport.
Best regards,
Wai-Ming
Thank you for your answer. Do you mean that Ki is a scaling factor for the strength of the field map?
My understanding to SPACE_CHARGE_COMP is scaling factor for the beam current in space charge calculation during transport.
Best regards,
Wai-Ming
- Fri 3 Mar 2023 17:21
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Space charge compensation for field map [SOLVED]
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4283
Space charge compensation for field map [SOLVED]
Dear Didier,
There is a "Ki" parameter in the FIELD_MAP statement for space charge compensation. Are the two models below equivalent?
(1)
FIELD_MAP x x x x x x 0.5
(2)
SPACE_CHARGE_COMP 0.5
FIELD_MAP x x x x x x 0
Best regards,
Wai-Ming
There is a "Ki" parameter in the FIELD_MAP statement for space charge compensation. Are the two models below equivalent?
(1)
FIELD_MAP x x x x x x 0.5
(2)
SPACE_CHARGE_COMP 0.5
FIELD_MAP x x x x x x 0
Best regards,
Wai-Ming
- Fri 3 Mar 2023 16:17
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Phase offset between field maps [SOLVED]
- Replies: 16
- Views: 6742
Re: Phase offset between field maps [SOLVED]
Dear Didier, The two models give the same input phases (-3.137° and 157.86°) if the FIELD_MAP statement is set to absolute phase, which is good. If the FIELD_MAP statement is set to relative phase, the input phases itself and the differences between these two values are different for the two models....
- Thu 2 Mar 2023 20:42
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: set_sync_phase [SOLVED]
- Replies: 9
- Views: 17780
Re: set_sync_phase [SOLVED]
Dear Didier, Thank you. I would like to make a request to make SET_SYNC_PHASE and ADJUST work together. In my application, I want to optimize the phase for other beam optics. But the initial phase value that makes physics sense to me is the synchronous phase. If I start with an arbitrary absolute ph...
- Thu 2 Mar 2023 05:48
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Link variables in ADJUST [SOLVED]
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2746
Re: Link variables in ADJUST [SOLVED]
Dear Didier, Thank you for testing on your side. I cannot show more. When I hit run, it flashes and disappears. It had happened several times in the past after a TraceWin upgrade. I suspect that it might be due to the cloud storage and firewall settings on my company computer. Since a few months ago...
- Wed 1 Mar 2023 22:12
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Link variables in ADJUST [SOLVED]
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2746
Re: Link variables in ADJUST [SOLVED]
Dear Didier,
Thank you. Could you have potentially introduced a bug in the new version? It crashes on some of my models that run fine on the previous version.
Best regards,
Wai-Ming
Thank you. Could you have potentially introduced a bug in the new version? It crashes on some of my models that run fine on the previous version.
Best regards,
Wai-Ming
- Wed 1 Mar 2023 21:07
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: set_sync_phase [SOLVED]
- Replies: 9
- Views: 17780
Re: set_sync_phase [SOLVED]
Dear Didier, Thank you. "Use new synchronous phase definition" works. How do I change the calculation step? It triggers another question: how can I control the "lattice" command, such as calculation step? To my understanding, both "set_sync_phase" and "lattice" are optimization. However, unlike "mat...
- Wed 1 Mar 2023 17:44
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Phase offset between field maps [SOLVED]
- Replies: 16
- Views: 6742
Re: Phase offset between field maps [SOLVED]
Dear Didier, I am aware of the "absolute phase" column in the data tab. It gives the absolute phase when the reference ion is at the beginning and at the end of an element. My problem is that with a field map, I can make it arbitrarily long. Please see fieldmap.PNG. The two models have identical phy...