Dear Nicholas,
Thanks again!
Best regards,
Wai-Ming
Phase offset between field maps [SOLVED]
-
- Skilled
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Mon 7 Dec 2020 06:17
- Location: Boston
- Country:
United States of America (us)
Re: Phase offset between field maps
Dear Didier,
Is there a handy way of extracting the "input phase" for all cavities? The closest is "Cav_set_point_res.dat" but it only contains the synchronous phase. Can you add a column to that file? Or is it recorded somewhere?
Best regards,
Wai-Ming
Is there a handy way of extracting the "input phase" for all cavities? The closest is "Cav_set_point_res.dat" but it only contains the synchronous phase. Can you add a column to that file? Or is it recorded somewhere?
Best regards,
Wai-Ming
Re: Phase offset between field maps
Dear Wai-Ming,
I added a culumn RF_phase
Regards,
Didier
I added a culumn RF_phase
Regards,
Didier
-
- Skilled
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Mon 7 Dec 2020 06:17
- Location: Boston
- Country:
United States of America (us)
Re: Phase offset between field maps
Thanks, Didier.
Wai-Ming
Wai-Ming
-
- Skilled
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Mon 7 Dec 2020 06:17
- Location: Boston
- Country:
United States of America (us)
Re: Phase offset between field maps
Dear Didier and Nicholas,
A follow up question on the interpretation of the Input Phase (now called RF phase) for field maps at different frequencies. Please see attachment.
In the project, A1 is at 100MHz and A2 is at 200MHz. I believe the RF Phase reported for A1 is the wall clock phase counted at 100MHz, while the RF Phase for A2 is the wall clock phase counted at 200MHz. Is it correct?
In this particular example, A1 is leading A2 by:
71.2/2-(-3.1)=38.7 at 100MHz, or
71.2-(-3.1*2)=77.4 at 200MHz
Is it correct?
Best regards,
Wai-Ming
A follow up question on the interpretation of the Input Phase (now called RF phase) for field maps at different frequencies. Please see attachment.
In the project, A1 is at 100MHz and A2 is at 200MHz. I believe the RF Phase reported for A1 is the wall clock phase counted at 100MHz, while the RF Phase for A2 is the wall clock phase counted at 200MHz. Is it correct?
In this particular example, A1 is leading A2 by:
71.2/2-(-3.1)=38.7 at 100MHz, or
71.2-(-3.1*2)=77.4 at 200MHz
Is it correct?
Best regards,
Wai-Ming
- Attachments
-
- phase_offset.dat
- (280 Bytes) Downloaded 116 times
-
- A2_78_134.edz
- (2.63 KiB) Downloaded 115 times
-
- A1_72_128.edz
- (2.5 KiB) Downloaded 136 times
-
- phase_offset.ini
- (43.77 KiB) Downloaded 109 times
Re: Phase offset between field maps
Dear Wai-Ming,
The absolute phase of each cavity is the phase of the RF field in the cavity (oscillating with the RF frequency of the cavity) at the start of the simulation.
If you add a drift L at the start of the simulation:
- the absolute phase in A1 is reduced by: dphi_A1 = 360°*100MHz*L/(beta*c)
- the absolute phase in A2 is reduced by: dphi_A2 = 360°*200MHz*L/(beta*c) = 2*dphi_A1
for example : L = 1 mm --> dphi_A1 = 2.6° and dphi_A2 =5.2°.
I hope it is clear ?
Best regards.
Nicolas.
The absolute phase of each cavity is the phase of the RF field in the cavity (oscillating with the RF frequency of the cavity) at the start of the simulation.
If you add a drift L at the start of the simulation:
- the absolute phase in A1 is reduced by: dphi_A1 = 360°*100MHz*L/(beta*c)
- the absolute phase in A2 is reduced by: dphi_A2 = 360°*200MHz*L/(beta*c) = 2*dphi_A1
for example : L = 1 mm --> dphi_A1 = 2.6° and dphi_A2 =5.2°.
I hope it is clear ?
Best regards.
Nicolas.
-
- Skilled
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Mon 7 Dec 2020 06:17
- Location: Boston
- Country:
United States of America (us)
Re: Phase offset between field maps
Dear Nicolas,
The 1mm test is great. I have the answer I wanted. Thanks.
Best regards,
Wai-Ming
The 1mm test is great. I have the answer I wanted. Thanks.
Best regards,
Wai-Ming