Second beam mass  [SOLVED]

https://www.dacm-logiciels.fr/tracewin
Post Reply
Spainpedro
Beginner
Beginner
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu 21 Sep 2023 10:34
Country:
Spain (es)
Spain

Second beam mass

Post by Spainpedro »

When a second beam is defined, the mass shown in “Beam data” of the main tab is not well defined. Despite correctly defining the mass of the ions, the rest energy data in “Beam data” remains the same as for the main beam.

This affects the results, since when the phase space is exported to ASCII file, the mass is taken from the main beam, not from the secondary beam.
User avatar
FranceDidier
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 984
Joined: Wed 26 Aug 2020 14:40
Country:
France (fr)
France

Re: Second beam mass

Post by FranceDidier »

Dear Pedro,

Please show me your example, because on my side everthing seems ok (see below)

Regards,

Didier
beam-data.png
beam-data.png (177.69 KiB) Viewed 1826 times
Spainpedro
Beginner
Beginner
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu 21 Sep 2023 10:34
Country:
Spain (es)
Spain

Re: Second beam mass

Post by Spainpedro »

Sorry because I think I made a mistake when launching the simulation and I had not loaded the distribution properly.

Anyway, when I export the output beam from Chart->Output->Save (to txt) the mass that appears in the header corresponds to the mass of the main beam that is taken as reference. Therefore, no information about the mass of the secondary beam ions is saved. It would be nice to have a column with the mass of the ions.

I attach a screenshot and the second beam file, corresponding to oxygen ions but the mass shown in the txt file is taken from the main beam (carbon ions).
Attachments
secondBeam.txt
(24.66 MiB) Downloaded 29 times
Captura de pantalla 2024-10-04 144103.png
Captura de pantalla 2024-10-04 144103.png (298.59 KiB) Viewed 1822 times
User avatar
FranceDidier
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 984
Joined: Wed 26 Aug 2020 14:40
Country:
France (fr)
France

Re: Second beam mass  [SOLVED]

Post by FranceDidier »

Dear Pedro,

Indeed, I see the problem.
It's been corrected in the latest version available on the site

Regards,

Didier
Post Reply