Beam extraction line: quadrupole offset
Posted: Thu 16 Oct 2025 06:59
Dear Didier,
Thanks for your help and support.
I am currently designing a beam extraction line consisting of a pulse bending followed by a doublet quadrupole.
As shown in the next figure: The quadrupoles belong to the main line; therefore, the extracted beam will present a relative offset as a result of the bend of the pulse magnet (which is simulated using a dipole, the bend is on the horizontal plane). When I simulated that in TraceWin, I noticed that the beam centroid and the quadrupoles' centroid are the same. Thus, the offset kick is not simulated.
I tried to simulate the offset using "shift dx dy", where "dx" is the relative offset produced by the pulse magnet.
For this case, as the horizontal offset is 32 mm (computed analytically and confirmed by Synoptic plot in TraceWin), I shift the first quadrupole to -32 mm However, when I plotted and compared the Synoptic plot in TraceWin with and without a shift. The beam centroid
is smaller at the entrance of the quadrupole for the case with shift, which is strange for me since the shift is only applied at the quadrupole not the previous drift space. I was expecting to have the same centroid and only be different from the quadrupole to the end.
Do I simulate the quadrupole offset correct?
I have attached the TraceWin files in case you would like to cross-check.
Best regards,
Bruce
Thanks for your help and support.
I am currently designing a beam extraction line consisting of a pulse bending followed by a doublet quadrupole.
As shown in the next figure: The quadrupoles belong to the main line; therefore, the extracted beam will present a relative offset as a result of the bend of the pulse magnet (which is simulated using a dipole, the bend is on the horizontal plane). When I simulated that in TraceWin, I noticed that the beam centroid and the quadrupoles' centroid are the same. Thus, the offset kick is not simulated.
I tried to simulate the offset using "shift dx dy", where "dx" is the relative offset produced by the pulse magnet.
For this case, as the horizontal offset is 32 mm (computed analytically and confirmed by Synoptic plot in TraceWin), I shift the first quadrupole to -32 mm However, when I plotted and compared the Synoptic plot in TraceWin with and without a shift. The beam centroid
is smaller at the entrance of the quadrupole for the case with shift, which is strange for me since the shift is only applied at the quadrupole not the previous drift space. I was expecting to have the same centroid and only be different from the quadrupole to the end.
Do I simulate the quadrupole offset correct?
I have attached the TraceWin files in case you would like to cross-check.
Best regards,
Bruce