About input matched beam

https://www.dacm-logiciels.fr/tracewin
Post Reply
ChinaEmily
Neophyte
Neophyte
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu 14 Jan 2021 02:28
Country:
China (cn)
China

About input matched beam

Post by ChinaEmily »

Dear Didier,
I used the matching option (1) Calculate input matched beam to calculate matched beam for a FFDD period, and found the calculated result is:

Twiss_parameters_of_matched_beam ; Criterion=1.958483e-011
0.5058262122 0.1630822965 0.2914046369
1.8464836872 -1.0570016401 -0.0124267708

but the multiparticle simulation shows the input matched beam is as following, the beam ellipses are different with the matching results. I don't know why. I attached the lattice files.
Attachments
Linac.dat
(327 Bytes) Downloaded 75 times
csns_linac.ini
(43.77 KiB) Downloaded 97 times
input beam.jpg
input beam.jpg (283.69 KiB) Viewed 1336 times
FranceNicolasChauvin
Global moderators
Global moderators
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri 2 Sep 2022 11:39
Country:
France (fr)
France

Re: About input matched beam

Post by FranceNicolasChauvin »

Dear Emily,

I ran the Tracewin project you sent and it worked fine. In fact, the results of the matching are written in the '.cal' file in the following order:

Twiss_parameters_of_matched_beam
betax betay betaz
alphax alphay alphaz


Then, if you plot beam distributions in the different phase spaces and if you check the Twiss parameters, you will see that they are the same as the ones found by the optimisation. In the figure you've attached, the first distribution (on the left) is plotted in the "x-y" plane. If you change to the "x-x'" plane, you will see that the Twiss parameters are compatible with the matching results (like in the other planes).

I hope it helped

Regards,

Nicolas.
ChinaEmily
Neophyte
Neophyte
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu 14 Jan 2021 02:28
Country:
China (cn)
China

Re: About input matched beam

Post by ChinaEmily »

Dear Nicolas,
Yes, you are right. I am so happy that the problem is solved. I checked other parts of the simulation but ignored the phase plane.
Thank you very much!

Regards,

Emily
Post Reply