TTF calculation / energy gain bug ?
Posted: Thu 23 Jul 2026 13:43
Hello,
After a long period without using GenDTL, I am back on it > Trying to design a DTL for He2+ (3727 MeV, charge 2) ... from 8 to approx 30 MeV.
I got something till the end but running TraceWin, I figured out the E gain was not the one expected and found a TTF pretty low.
checking further, for the first cell I got:
Lc 5.6 cm (correct, beta lambda at 2 MeV/u and 352.2 MHz)
for E0 3.3 MV/m, TTF 0.37 (quite low!!!) for a charge 2 and phase -30 deg makes it Egain around 0.12 MeV as in the file (column dW) while output energy is 8.24 MeV (column W)....
Now, trying to have the same design (still running full DTL) but with charge 1 and half the mass (1863 MeV) and half the input energy (4 MeV).
The first cell results are:
Lc 5.6 cm still OK.
E0 kept 3.3 MV/m, TTF 0.67 (twice as before and values that makes more sense) and column dW 0.11 MeV and output energy W 4.11 MeV are in line....
My question is the following:
Should we always consider running a charge 1 particles scaling the mass accordingly ? As it looks like this "feature" (limitation) is coming from DTLFish ?
After a long period without using GenDTL, I am back on it > Trying to design a DTL for He2+ (3727 MeV, charge 2) ... from 8 to approx 30 MeV.
I got something till the end but running TraceWin, I figured out the E gain was not the one expected and found a TTF pretty low.
checking further, for the first cell I got:
Lc 5.6 cm (correct, beta lambda at 2 MeV/u and 352.2 MHz)
for E0 3.3 MV/m, TTF 0.37 (quite low!!!) for a charge 2 and phase -30 deg makes it Egain around 0.12 MeV as in the file (column dW) while output energy is 8.24 MeV (column W)....
Now, trying to have the same design (still running full DTL) but with charge 1 and half the mass (1863 MeV) and half the input energy (4 MeV).
The first cell results are:
Lc 5.6 cm still OK.
E0 kept 3.3 MV/m, TTF 0.67 (twice as before and values that makes more sense) and column dW 0.11 MeV and output energy W 4.11 MeV are in line....
My question is the following:
Should we always consider running a charge 1 particles scaling the mass accordingly ? As it looks like this "feature" (limitation) is coming from DTLFish ?