Dear Didier,
Can you briefly explain or direct me to the literature explaining how the gas and magnetic stripping loss rates are calculated in TraceWin?
Thank you
With Regards
Abhishek Pathak
Gas and Magnetic stripping losses [SOLVED]
Re: Gas and Magnetic stripping losses [SOLVED]
Dear Abhishek,
I've used reference below:
https://journals.aps.org/prab/pdf/10.11 ... .24.074201
Regards,
Didier
I've used reference below:
https://journals.aps.org/prab/pdf/10.11 ... .24.074201
Regards,
Didier
Re: Gas and Magnetic stripping losses
Dear Didier,
For the gas command "GAS C, N, P," how do we define the atomic number for a molecule?
Thank you
With Regards
Abhishek Pathak
For the gas command "GAS C, N, P," how do we define the atomic number for a molecule?
Thank you
With Regards
Abhishek Pathak
Re: Gas and Magnetic stripping losses
Dear Abhishek,
For gas stripping N is useless,
Regards,
Didier
For gas stripping N is useless,
Regards,
Didier
Re: Gas and Magnetic stripping losses
Dear Didier,
Thank you for your clarification. To ensure my understanding is correct, I should use the cross section and the pressure to estimate the gas stripping losses, correct?
Additionally, I have another question: If I need to simulate a mixture of two gases, should I input two Gas commands consecutively, each with its respective cross-section and pressure?
Thank you once again.
Warm regards,
Abhishek Pathak
Thank you for your clarification. To ensure my understanding is correct, I should use the cross section and the pressure to estimate the gas stripping losses, correct?
Additionally, I have another question: If I need to simulate a mixture of two gases, should I input two Gas commands consecutively, each with its respective cross-section and pressure?
Thank you once again.
Warm regards,
Abhishek Pathak
Re: Gas and Magnetic stripping losses
Dear Abhishek,
Yes it's correct.
No, a new GAS command cancels and replaces the preceding one. You need to define an effective cross-section representative of the combination of your 2 gases.
Regards,
Didier
Yes it's correct.
No, a new GAS command cancels and replaces the preceding one. You need to define an effective cross-section representative of the combination of your 2 gases.
Regards,
Didier