CEA Codes forum

Dear Jonathan,

Ok It's fixed, but as it has no impact on simulations or even visualisations, it will not be effective until a later update.

Regards,

Didier

Dear Jonathan,

I'll check that, but as usual I need your project files.

Regards,

Didier

Dear Shuo, You should already understand that TraceWin is not designed to simulate an RFQ, and in fact we have a specific code for this type of structure, TOUTATIS, which is really designed for this purpose. Anyway, with TraceWin it's still possible via a field map, but TraceWin is not a time code l...

Dear Shuo, I wanted to inform you that in the latest version of TraceWin, after discussions with experts, I went back on the changes to the space-charge calculation that I had made following our exchange. In the end, these changes were not appropriate and it was the RF phase change that was the caus...

Dear Jonathan,

Bug fixed,

Regards,

Didier

Dear Jonathan,

Are you an exmaple to provide me?

Regards,

Didier

Dear Shuo, Ok, without waiting for my colleague to get back to me, I've made a few corrections in TraceWin to improve the situation considerably, but there are probably a few points that will need to be checked later here between space-charge experts. These changes have been incorporated into the la...

Dear shliu,

This only affected the display and has now been fixed

Regards,

Didier

Dear Abhishek, I don't knwon "MAD", but I think something like following should be similar. Regards, Didier variable Angle 6.5637426 ; (deg) variable Ldip 2449.79096 ; (m) drift 0 100 EDGE Angle/2 Ldip/(Angle*3.14159/180) 100 1e-8 1e-8 150 0 BEND Angle Ldip/(Angle*3.14159/180) 0 150 0 EDGE Angle/2 L...

Dear Shuo, OK, I've found the reason for the observed difference and it has nothing to do with my first explanation about the input distribution. It comes from an improvement made to the space-charge calculation, carried out by a colleague. However, in your case, is the difference significant and I'...