CEA Codes forum

Dear Didier,

Yes, that does the trick! Thanks a lot.
Is there a particular reason why you don't update the subsequent cavities in a period with the acceptance law, and instead use the same sync. phase as the first cavity?

Cheers,

Lennert

Hi Didier, I have a couple of questions regarding the synchronous phase: 1. I've noticed that there is a tiny difference between the set input synchronous phase (-45°) and the actual synchronous phase of the first cavity (44°). This is not immediately a problem, but I'm wondering where the differenc...

Cool, thanks! Kr, Lennert

You can find the field maps in the attachment. Thanks in advance! Kr, Lennert

The files are added in the attachment (field maps exluded). Cheers, Lennert

Hi, I'm having issues when running error studies on a linux computing cluster. These are the steps I follow: 1) I connect to a computing node that has reserved 50 cores for my job. 2) In the list of computers in the 'Errors'-tab I just have the Local (0.0.0.0) computer selected with 50 cores. 3) I s...

Dear Didier,

I can confirm that the issue is resolved with the latest upgrade. Thanks a lot!

Kind regards,

Lennert

P.s.: I just did the check myself and indeed it's related to the energy shift. without the shift and leaving the energy as is (1.52 MeV) the results are identical.

Hi Didier, you can find .zip file in the attachment. For the noX11 run I used the following commandline prompt: 'TraceWin_noX11 i1lb.ini path_cal=output_cmd partran=1 nbr_part1=535332 use_dst_file dst_file1=RFQ_exit_acc_centered.dst energy1=1.494 cancel_matchingp' Be aware that in this particular ca...

Hi Didier, when running TraceWin through the GUI and with TraceWin_noX11, I noticed subtle differences in the input distributions saved to the plt-file. Between the two, it looks like there is a linear scaling applied (see picture in the attachment showing the delta as a function of the parameter va...