CEA Codes forum

Dear Didier, I've done a linac design by using GenLinWin. What I've noted is that is reported by the envelopes plots a not correct sequence of elements, i.e. in the attached envelope.png the yellow box should be reported only two times, because I'm using two cavities. Instead the FM1 and FM2 maps ar...

Dear Didier,
in our linac at LNL we have a period formed by a triplet and a cryostat.
May you you insert in the Period type list also this combination:
F-D-F-Cryostat.
Best Regards,
Michele Comunian

Dear Didier, I'm doing some calculations about the ESS DTL. I've observed that the DTL_CEL line is somehow different respect to the GAP line, i.e.: DTL line on TraceWin: DTL_CEL 75.23682 25.0 24.6445 0.00999151 -59.9444 0.0 176192.0 -35.0 10.0 3.0 0.0884558 0.780607 -0.378458 -0.163516 ; Relative ph...

Dear Didier,
Apologies for the oversight. We've reviewed the files, and you are absolutely right — with the latest version, the code works correctly, just as it did before.
Thank you for pointing that out.
Best regards,
Michele Comunian

Dear Didier,
I've still problems to center the dipole map.
I've simplify as much as possible the project and I put it here.
The dipole fileds map is the same as before (working from 2016 to 2021).
Best Regards,
Michele Comunian

Dear Didier, I've seen that the project .dat file in the calculation directory report the values coming from the envelope matching also when has been used the partran macthing. Is this a correct behaviour of the Tracewin program ? In the attached example, I was aspetting 8323.34 V in the test_t1.dat...

Dear Didier, we try to simulate a tracewin line from 2021, which contains two dipole fieldmaps which perfectly worked in the past Tracewin version. However we noticed that, with the new versions, we had some losses inside the dipoles, apparently because all positive energy particles are canceled fro...

Dear Didier,
sorry!
You have reason: there was not matching on patrtran.
Best Regards,
Michele Comunian

Dear Didier, thank you for the work done. I've a question: is there a way to use the results of envelope adjust matching for the partran values matching ? I've attach an example: What I would like is to use the results of the quads: 36.49 and -9.26 as first values for the partran matching, instead t...

Dear Didier,
may you increase the number of maximum ADJUST command, now the limit is 9, may you increase that to 18 ?
Best Regards,
Michele Comunian