Search found 39 matches
- Thu 21 Nov 2024 09:18
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: PLOT_DST with errors study
- Replies: 3
- Views: 11
Re: PLOT_DST with errors study
Dear Didier, yes, when is indicate the command plot_dst "file" to save the distribution in a specific position along the line. We use this command to save the beam distribution where are the diagnostics or other important points. May be as final results of errors study something like: file00000.dst ...
- Wed 20 Nov 2024 16:49
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: PLOT_DST with errors study
- Replies: 3
- Views: 11
PLOT_DST with errors study
Dear Didier,
is it possible to get all the dst files generate by the plot_dst command when is done an errors study?
What happens now is that is stored only the nominal runs .dst result, not the .dst of the errors study results.
Best Regards,
Michele Comunian
is it possible to get all the dst files generate by the plot_dst command when is done an errors study?
What happens now is that is stored only the nominal runs .dst result, not the .dst of the errors study results.
Best Regards,
Michele Comunian
- Wed 10 Jul 2024 08:52
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Use of diagnostics on the second beam
- Replies: 3
- Views: 453
Re: Use of diagnostics on the second beam
Dear Didier, yes, if you fully implement the feature, you get practically a second TraceWin project, not a run of a second beam. We are designing a mebt coming from an RFQ, so we use the first beam with the rfq output without the not accelerated particles, and the second beam with the not accelerate...
- Tue 9 Jul 2024 13:58
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Use of diagnostics on the second beam
- Replies: 3
- Views: 453
Use of diagnostics on the second beam
Dear Didier,
is there any way to adjust the diagnostics differently between the first and second beam?
I mean a way to have different settings or avoid the action of the adjust on the second beam?
Best Regards,
Michele Comunian
is there any way to adjust the diagnostics differently between the first and second beam?
I mean a way to have different settings or avoid the action of the adjust on the second beam?
Best Regards,
Michele Comunian
- Fri 24 May 2024 15:58
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Stat results from errors study on second beam
- Replies: 1
- Views: 564
Stat results from errors study on second beam
Dear Didier, I get a problem of reading the file "Statistic_Errors_1_PAR_tot2.txt" relative to the second beam, in particular, is not show the plot of emitXXp growth with the message: "No data to plot". Instead with the first beam everything works without problem. I've attach the tracewin project. B...
- Tue 14 May 2024 15:58
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Input line parameters
- Replies: 4
- Views: 766
Re: Input line parameters
Dear Didier,
thank you!!!
B.R.
Michele Comunian
thank you!!!
B.R.
Michele Comunian
- Tue 14 May 2024 09:00
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Input line parameters
- Replies: 4
- Views: 766
Re: Input line parameters
Dear Didier, as you can image, we are using TraceWin in a lot of various scenarios. When we use it from the command line, i.e. without gui, some times we are not able to reproduce the results of the gui version, because some parameters are not the same in the used .ini file. In my opinion, you can k...
- Mon 13 May 2024 10:24
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: set B value for Bending Magnet
- Replies: 1
- Views: 498
set B value for Bending Magnet
Dear Didier,
is it possible to introduce on TraceWin the value of the magnetic field used for the bending magnet element?
I mean to have the possibility to fix the value of the magnetic field B used in the simulation, independently from the Brho of the beam.
Best Regards,
Michele Comunian
is it possible to introduce on TraceWin the value of the magnetic field used for the bending magnet element?
I mean to have the possibility to fix the value of the magnetic field B used in the simulation, independently from the Brho of the beam.
Best Regards,
Michele Comunian
- Fri 10 May 2024 16:11
- Forum: TraceWin
- Topic: Input line parameters
- Replies: 4
- Views: 766
Input line parameters
Dear Didier,
what about adding as input variable parameters on the command line, for the no gui tracewin version, the following aspects:
1) Partran space charge options.
2) Input distribution type.
3) Partran energy and phase limits.
My Best Regards,
Michele comunian
what about adding as input variable parameters on the command line, for the no gui tracewin version, the following aspects:
1) Partran space charge options.
2) Input distribution type.
3) Partran energy and phase limits.
My Best Regards,
Michele comunian
- Mon 22 Jan 2024 09:44
- Forum: Toutatis
- Topic: Article on Comparison of longitudinal emittance of various RFQs
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1840
Article on Comparison of longitudinal emittance of various RFQs
Dar All,
I think can be very interesting, for peoples involved on RFQ design, the following my article (open access) with doi:
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/19/01/P01024
All the simulations has been done with Toutatis.
Please feel free to ask about that.
Best Regards,
Michele Comunian
I think can be very interesting, for peoples involved on RFQ design, the following my article (open access) with doi:
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/19/01/P01024
All the simulations has been done with Toutatis.
Please feel free to ask about that.
Best Regards,
Michele Comunian