CEA Codes forum

Dear Didier,

Thanks for pointing out my silly mistake.
For the record, I am able to get the same results. Best regards,

Bruce

Dear Didier, Thanks for the information. About the "adjust" command, like there are "ADJUST_STEERER", "ADJUST_STEERER_BX", etc. I was wondering If I can create my own command for the compensation? I was working on my own diagnostic for energy compensation and phase one similar to "Denergy" and "Dpha...

Dear Didier,

In relation to my own diagnostic, I want to develop my own "adjust" element. Could you show me an example?


I am interested in developing my own "adjust" for the phase and eacc cavity.,i.e "ADJUST #elem -3 0 -5 5 1
" and "ADJUST #elem -6 0 0 1.2 0.025".

Best regards,

Bruce

Dear Didier,

Thank you very much for the information. Now, I can obtain the same results for both cases.

Best regards,

Bruce

Dear Didier,

Thank you very much for the information.

Best regards,

Bruce

Dear Didier, Thanks again for your explanation. Please allow me one more thing. Which is the matrix representation for an RF cavity for a field map in TraceWin? I found in the Manual the matrix for a bunched cavity. However, I could not find the matrix for an RF cavity for a field map in TraceWin. M...

Dear Didier,

Thanks for the information. In that case, Do you have any reference for that?

Finally a friendly comment. I think that the definition of K0s, it should include the division by period length. Or change Ko by sigma0.

Best regards,

Bruce

Dear Didier, Thanks for your suggestion. As you recommended, I run a normal case to obtain the new lattice. Lattice.PNG In this case, you can see that the magnetic field of the solenoids for the left (normal matching case output) are the same as the ones in the new lattice (right). With the new case...

Dear Didier, Thank you very much, Yes, I should divide by the period length. About the phase definition, I am familiar with the expression of phase advance per period (sigma). It was that extra term " square root (1-determinant (Mxy))" that is new for me. Especially, because for Koz, the matrix shou...

Dear Didier, I checked the performance of the "Twiss match with family and twiss command" for the transient simulations. I made two runs of the same lattice. On the left is the normal simulation and on the right with transient one. Test1.png Both have the same setting for matching with "Twiss match ...