Regarding electron acceleration in TraceWin
-
rahulrrcat
- Novice
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri 22 Aug 2025 12:16
- Country:
India (in)
Regarding electron acceleration in TraceWin
I have recently run a simulation in TraceWin to accelerate 90 keV, 500 mA electron beam in 1D field map of 5-cell beta = 0.92 elliptical cavity. In case of DC beam, the transmission is only 30%. I have observed a discrepancy in calculation of beam power loss. As I increase the calculation steps and space-charge steps, the beam power loss is increasing. At 100 steps per beta*lambda, power loss is 130 kW, whereas at 1000 steps, the beam power loss is 2 MW, which is not expected.
Re: Regarding electron acceleration in TraceWin
Dear Dr. Rahu,
I have no way of verifying what you're saying if you don't send me the TraceWin project file(s), simplified if necessary, so that I can see what you're looking at.
Regards,
Didier
I have no way of verifying what you're saying if you don't send me the TraceWin project file(s), simplified if necessary, so that I can see what you're looking at.
Regards,
Didier
-
rahulrrcat
- Novice
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri 22 Aug 2025 12:16
- Country:
India (in)
Re: Regarding electron acceleration in TraceWin
Dear Dr. Didier,
The files, which I am using, are attached here with.
Thanks and Regards,
Rahul
The files, which I am using, are attached here with.
Thanks and Regards,
Rahul
- Attachments
-
- try_650MHz_b092.ini
- (43.77 KiB) Not downloaded yet
-
- try_650MHz_b092.dat
- (178 Bytes) Downloaded 2 times
-
- full_1DField.edz
- (101.58 KiB) Downloaded 2 times
Re: Regarding electron acceleration in TraceWin
Dear Dr. Rahu,
I must admit that your simulation deviates somewhat from the operating modes intended for the code; sending a continuous beam into RF cavities is not really common practice.
Well, with a few minor approximations, I think the losses are now better managed and remain more or less stable depending on the calculation step. The new version of TraceWin is available for update.
Regards
Didier
I must admit that your simulation deviates somewhat from the operating modes intended for the code; sending a continuous beam into RF cavities is not really common practice.
Well, with a few minor approximations, I think the losses are now better managed and remain more or less stable depending on the calculation step. The new version of TraceWin is available for update.
Regards
Didier